Jamie Loeb vs Gabriela Lee Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 May at 04:13 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Loeb vs G. Lee

USA
0
Win
Played
3
Win

ROU
0
Win
Played
3
Win
Head-to-head: Loeb 0 - 3 Lee
They have played 6 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 0 and Gabriela Lee winning 6. The last match between Gabriela Lee and Jamie Loeb was at the W50 Pelham, 21-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Gabriela Lee getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loeb | 0 |
| Lee | 3 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Pelham(05-21-25)
(Q3) Fifth Third Charleston - Charleston(11-18-24)
(R1) W60 Charlottesville(04-25-23)
J. Loeb vs G. Lee H2H Profile
J. Loeb vs G. Lee Match Preview:
- Recent analysis of second serve success shows Loeb earning 41.02% of points and Lee slightly ahead with 42.52%. How significant is this stat in forecasting a match outcome? It's proven quite telling.
- In return games, Loeb leads by capturing 50.7% of second serve points, while Lee is at 48.44%. Their efficiency on returning first serves is nearly identical, with Loeb at 33.21% and Lee at 33.59%.
- Under pressure, Loeb has saved 52.9% of breakpoints, surpassing Lee's 47.76%. This advantage might be pivotal in crucial moments.
- Looking at last year's performances, Loeb shows a slight edge with a 47.27% match win rate compared to Lee's 43.48%.
- Loeb's strength is on Hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Lee excels on Clay with 60%. Both struggle on Grass, with Loeb at 32% and Lee at 20%.
- They have competed twice head-to-head, with Lee winning both encounters along with all four sets played. Could this give Lee the psychological edge?
- In the context of event level play, Loeb's opponent quality averaged at a rank of 391.51, while Lee faced tougher competition with an average rank of 358.04.
- When it comes to deciding sets, Loeb has fared marginally better, winning 42% versus Lee's 40% over the last year.
- Lee has been more efficient in converting breakpoints recently, achieving a 50% success rate compared to Loeb's 38.46%.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
Gabriela Lee enters this match with an edge based on their head-to-head history, having won both previous encounters, including all sets played. This could provide a psychological edge going into the match.
Loeb's overall gameplay statistics show marginal strengths in certain areas, such as breakpoint saving and first serve return efficiency. However, Lee's capability to convert breakpoints and handle second serves slightly more effectively could be critical under match pressure.
Given the playing surfaces, Loeb might be more comfortable on Hard courts, but their past struggles against Lee remain a concern. Lee's clay court prowess, while not directly relevant for this match, indicates adaptability and strength in match conditions.
Considering these factors, alongside Lee's success in their limited head-to-head matchups, Lee is likely to maintain their winning record against Loeb in the upcoming contest.
Jamie Loeb vs Gabriela Lee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Loeb vs G. Lee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 3 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 21 | Games Won | 37 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:31:59 | Average Match Time | 1:31:59 |
| 54% (105/193) | 1st Serve % | 61% (124/204) |
| 63% (66/105) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (85/124) |
| 40% (35/88) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (43/80) |
| 28% (5/18) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (11/22) |
| 37% (76/204) | Return Points Win % | 48% (92/193) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Loeb Recent Matches Played
G. Lee Recent Matches Played

J. Loeb vs G. Lee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.91% (324/277) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.34% (311/251) |
| 53.36% (739/646) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.73% (700/579) |
| 51.27% (6503/6180) | Games Win/Loss | 52.16% (6053/5552) |
| 57.06% (190/143) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.54% (46/55) |
| 51.72% (90/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.86% (249/167) |
| 52.17% (36/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.46% (15/24) |
| 32.00% (8/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1472 | Aces Total | 459 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1745 | Total Double Faults | 1314 |
| 1:18:23 | Average Match Time | 1:12:3 |
| 516.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 479.2 |
| 54% (17485/32413) | 1st Serve % | 65% (17586/27070) |
| 65% (11351/17485) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (10590/17586) |
| 46% (6867/14927) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4404/9482) |
| 47% (1765/3778) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1548/3238) |
| 44% (14442/33101) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12076/26699) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Slam W/L | 16.67% (2/10) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 42.59% (23/31) | Main Tour W/L | 35.90% (14/25) |
| 53.80% (255/219) | Challenger W/L | 55.98% (206/162) |
| 90.00% (27/3) | Futures W/L | 62.68% (89/53) |
| 54% (320/593) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (306/557) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 45% (54/119) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (62/108) |
| 50% (92/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (76/159) |
| 83% (344/287) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (307/275) |
| 16% (344/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (307/32) |
| 14% (257/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (255/34) |